Preview of MEMS in Emerging Technologies Panel at MEMS Executive Congress US 2012

By Karen Lightman, managing director, MEMS Industry Group

Typically at MEMS Executive Congress, both US and Europe, we have panel topics that fit neatly into neat little packages like “MEMS in Consumer” or “MEMS Automotive.” This year in planning for our US event, our steering committee wanted to shake things up a bit to delve into what’s next for MEMS (beyond iPhone and Galaxy, Kinect, Kindle and name-that-new-and-exciting automotive safety or driver-assist application). After all, the theme of MEMS Executive Congress US is “MEMS is in the mainstream—so what’s next?” And what’s next is emerging technologies.

Our “MEMS in Emerging Technologies” panel will help to foretell what’s next. Staffed by experts who are at the forefront of emerging technologies in their respective fields, our panelists, these are the guys who are doing the “blue sky” thinking; they are tinkering in the lab and thinking the “what if” questions, and yes, they are doing it with MEMS. I am thrilled to have as panel moderator, Steve Whalley, director, Sensors, Intel Architecture Group, Intel Corporation.

Steve and I recently spoke about MEMS in Emerging Technologies and he gave me an introduction of our impressive panelists and a sneak peak into what the panelists will be discussing at MEMS Executive Congress US 2012.

Q: Steve – I am impressed by the combination of research and real-world experience of your panelists. Can you tell me more about who they are?

A: Jon Kindred is senior director of signals and systems, Starkey Laboratories. Jon provided technical and managerial leadership during Starkey’s ascent in becoming best in class in many significant signal-processing features.

Jon is joined by Hughes Metras, vice president, strategic partnerships, North America, CEA-LETI. Hughes has been involved in microelectronics, addressing power conversion for industrial, automotive and PV applications, and solid-state lighting, as well as sensor technologies for healthcare and environmental issues.

And last but certainly not least is Todd Miller, lab manager, MicroSystems and MicroFluidics, GE Global Research. Todd has focused on design and development of high-volume manufacturing devices and systems in safety-critical applications, with a concentration in system engineering, MEMS design and establishing design and quality control methodologies to support high-volume production.

MIG at BSAC’s Fall 2012 IAB & Research Review

The MIG team traveled to Berkeley, California last week to host a workshop on MEMS Product Development Challenges, part of BSAC’s Fall 2012 IAB & Research Review.  We were very honored to host a workshop with BSAC for the second year in a row.  The presentations from the workshop are available to MIG members in the Resource Library on our web site.

Karen Lightman kicked off the day by presenting an overview of MIG and the current state of the industry including potential areas for collaboration.

Dave Monk, Sensor Product Manager at Freescale presented a case study on MEMS product development evolution and lessons learned.

Angelo Assimakopoulos, Director of New Business Development at Knowles Electronics discussed the history of Knowles and the challenges they faced developing a MEMS microphone.

Next up was Peter Himes, VP of Marketing at Silex Microsystems. He discussed a foundry’s perspective on process standardization vs full customization.

The Next Revolution in MEMS: a look inside

By Chris Keimel, Editor

Aero Thermal & Mechanical Systems
Niskayuna, NY USA

 

Originally posted on GE Global Research’s blog: Edison’s Desk

Last week, I shared with you an introduction to MEMS devices and how most of us use these devices every day—without even knowing. This week, GE asked technology enthusiasts in the twitter space to share what they think is the greatest invention of the past century. I was reading through this list as I was writing this blog post, and I couldn’t help but think how a majority of the technologies in this list utilize MEMS! From video games to computers to the telephone, MEMS devices have been a part of some of the greatest technologies in the past 100 years!

Before we share with you next week what we are doing to further revolutionize MEMS devices, we decided to give you a peek inside our cleanroom at GE Global Research and to show you where we developed our metal MEMS technology and make MEMS devices. One of the unique aspects of our MEMS device technology is that we use metals, in place of traditional silicon, to form robust and reliable devices.  We take advantage of the metal’s properties, such as conductivity, to significantly advance device performance and enable new MEMS device capabilities. Check out the video below and feel free to leave any comments or questions. Don’t forget to check out the blog next week when we finally reveal what we have been working on in the MEMS space.

Preview of MEMS in Medical/Quality of Life Panel at MEMS Executive Congress US 2012

By Karen Lightman, managing director, MEMS Industry Group

For those of you who have heard me talk about MEMS and Medical/Quality of Life (QoL applications – I don’t shy away from calling it “God’s work.” I still get misty-eyed when I think about my friend’s ten year-old daughter, Anna, who has type 1 Diabetes. Last year I told Anna about technology from MicroCHIPS that (thanks to the wonders of MEMS) will someday enable her to seamlessly and automatically monitor and dose her insulin without having to prick her finger and then calculate and administer a dose before every meal or snack. She’ll get her dignity back and she’ll improve her quality of life.

The Holy Grail in medicine is not diagnosing Diabetes, Alzheimer’s or even obesity; it’s figuring out what’s next and how to deal with it. MEMS technology can and will help to navigate that path.

With MEMS technology fundamental to new medical/QoL devices and applications, understanding opportunities in this rapid-growth market is more important than ever. At MEMS Executive Congress US 2012, we’ve lined up a panel of industry experts to discuss how MEMS continues to play a critical role in the development of new technologies that assist with patient monitoring, diagnostics, therapy and portable health care.

To preview our panel, I’ve invited my moderator, Jeannette F. Wilson, product line manager, Sensor and Actuator Solution Division (SASD) / AISG, Freescale Semiconductor, to introduce our panelists and share her thoughts on what they will discuss.

Choosing a MEMS Foundry

By Karen Lightman, managing director, MEMS Industry Group

While micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) industry leaders such as STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments, Hewlett Packard, Robert Bosch and Kionix rely on their captive fabs to meet volume production, the movement toward fabless and fab-lite models continues to gain ground. InvenSense, for example, has always been a fabless company, and even powerhouse Analog Devices uses a hybrid approach, choosing internal and external foundries to produce MEMS die for inertial sensor products. Despite the advantages of having a captive fab, which supporters say includes greater control over both capacity and intellectual property (IP), the primary disadvantage—cost—has spurred the use of third-party foundries.

In addition to cost savings, companies work with third-party MEMS foundries for a variety of reasons. They may want to prove a design, prototype a design that is already proven, or mass-produce a MEMS device. With a multitude of options, choosing a MEMS foundry is not a simple decision.

Pure-play MEMS foundries, such as Silex Microsystems, Micralyne, Teledyne DALSA, Asia Pacific Microsystems, Innovative Micro Technology (IMT) and Tronics do not offer design services but they do offer volume production. Partially captive foundries offer another alternative. They will fabricate MEMS die for outside customers when there is excess fab capacity.

Companies such as A.M. Fitzgerald & Associates, Nanoshift and SVTC specialize in design and rapid prototyping, and also consult with their clients to find the perfect foundry partner. Dr. Carolyn White of A.M. Fitzgerald & Associates, who specializes in design, analysis and fabrication for her firm, explains why foundry selection is so critical in the MEMS industry: “In the IC world, you can potentially have a device ready to ship to customers in 18 months—but not in the MEMS world. Even with an existing prototype (with a proven process flow), it takes time to choose a foundry partner and bring the process flow into production. Foundries first do an initial prototype run, then move to pilot production and finally go to full-volume production. That takes at least a year and a half. Total time to market can be five years and could cost in the range of US$10 million for a new device using the fabless model.”

White says that a foundry partner with the right experience can help companies to overcome common technical and logistical challenges—such as coupled physics, moving parts, environmental exposure, and test and packaging challenges. MEMS also presents design challenges that foundries cannot meet alone, according to White. With few formal standards, diverse tool sets and foundry-specific design rules not yet available for existing simulation packages, companies need good design and process engineers to work with the foundry throughout the process.